Russell v. Superior Court of Placer Cty.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
We issued an order to show cause on the petition of the defendant-cross-complaining husband for a writ of prohibition in this divorce action to examine the question whether the trial court had lost jurisdiction to reconsider and possibly extend an alimony award on the wife’s petition. The latter petition had been made after the final decree of divorce in which the subject of alimony is not mentioned. A refined version of the question is: Had the court, as it intended to do, reserved jurisdiction over alimony until one of the parties reminded the court of a prearranged and stipulated plan that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Tolle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Key System Transit Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Maben v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Hennefer v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.