Legal Opinion

Rozeboom v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1984No. 13858PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, Justice

(on reassignment).

For purposes of convenience and clarity, plaintiff-appellant (Marion Rozeboom, individually, and d/b/a Rozy’s Electric) shall be designated Citizen or Rozy and defendant-appellee (Northwestern Bell Telephone Company) shall be referred to as Bell.

Citizen Rozy brought this action to recover $25,000.00 in damages when Bell failed to publish Rozy’s business listing in the yellow pages of Bell’s May 1980 directory. Citizen Rozy is an electrical contractor doing business under the name of Rozy’s Electric. For several years he was listed in Bell’s telephone directory, both for his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Schmidt v. Wildcat Cave, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Laber v. KochSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Art's Flower Shop, Inc. v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. ELEC. SEC. SYSTEMS v. Southern BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API