Legal Opinion
Antell v. Stokes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 25, 1934PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
Several petitions for writs of mandamus were consolidated for purposes of hearing by the single justice, who then reported the cases without decision. Each plaintiff prays for a writ to compel the respondents, the school committee of the city of Haverhill, to reinstate her as a pupil in the high school of that city. The material facts are agreed. The school committee passed a rule entitled “Regulations on Fraternities and Sororities” of the tenor following: “On and after May 15, 1933 no student in the Haverhill High School shall be pledged to or join a secret organization composed wholly or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Waugh v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Barnard v. Inhabitants of ShelburneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Wilson v. Board of Education of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- McDuffy v. Secretary of the Executive Office of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Leonard v. School Committee of AttleboroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Doe v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Ring v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Cady v. Plymouth-Carver Regional School DistrictMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.