Barnard v. Inhabitants of Shelburne
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is an action of tort to recover damages (as alleged in the declaration) for wrongful exclusion of the plaintiff from the “public High School” of Shelburne. The trial judge * ruled that there was no evidence that the plaintiff might not have gone to a school of the ninth grade. This ruling appears to have been right and became the law of the case for the purposes of that trial.
The evidence tended to show that the plaintiff entered the high school in its freshman class in the autumn of 1910, and that from the first he fell below the required standard of excellence in one or more branches…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrison v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Hodgkins v. Inhabitants of RockportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Watson v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Morse v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Morrison v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connelly v. University of Vermont & State Agricultural CollegeDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1965
- Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Dorothy Gaspar v. John C. Bruton, Individually and as Superintendent of Gordon Cooper Area Vocational-Technical SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.