Legal Opinion
Ring v. City of Woburn
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 22, 1942PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
These are four petitions in equity brought by ten or more taxable inhabitants of the respondent city under the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 71, § 34, inserted by St. 1939, c. 294. Demurrers to three of the petitions were overruled by interlocutory decrees, and it was agreed that trial on the merits might proceed without any action on the demurrer in the other case, its final disposition to depend upon the final disposition of the other demurrers. The respondent, however, waived its appeals from these interlocutory decrees in this court.
The several petitions relate to the alleged failure…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Decatur v. Auditor of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Moran v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Richard D. Kimball Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Greenaway's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Cotter v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.