Legal Opinion
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 29, 1934No. 7 Div. 233PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The undisputed facts of this ease show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Batty, 227 Ala. 50, 148 So. 811; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Harden, 227 Ala. 700, 150 So. 921.
No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those eases.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. BattySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. HarderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- De Almada v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldArizona Supreme Court · 1937