Legal Opinion

De Almada v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1937No. Civil No. 3786PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Guadalupe C. de Almada, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against the Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to recover on an insurance certificate issued by defendant to Anselmo A. Almada, hereinafter called deceased, in which plaintiff, his wife, was named as the beneficiary. The trial of the action was commenced before the court sitting with a jury, but at the close of the evidence it was stipulated between the parties that the case might be withdrawn from the jury and submitted to the court for determination. This was done, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PettidArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. HardeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  4. Daly v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Terry v. State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Equitable Life & Casualty Insurance v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. McClain v. BederCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Yank v. JuhrendCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API