Legal Opinion

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Batty

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1933No. 2 Div. 24PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

There is no material difference between the contract of insurance interpreted in Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562, and the contract involved in this case, and the majority of the court, consisting of ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, THOMAS, BOUDDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., are of the opinion that said case is sound and should not be overruled. On the authority of that case the court did not err in sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrers to defendant’s special plea.

All the justices concur in the opinion of BROWN, J., in so far as it deals with the question of evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Barthel v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. HarderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Benjamin v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. DownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API