Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 64PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, .T.
The only question on this appeal is a proper construction of the certificate of insurance in a fraternal benefit society.
The insured had been a member of the order in go*od standing about thirteen years when the certificate of insurance was by agreement canceled and a new one issued. As preliminary to its issuance, he signed an application for it, which contained, a clause surrendering” all rights under , the old certificate, and containing the following statement: “The new certificate is to become effective on the first day of April, 1929, and to. bear the date of April 1, 1925,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Rose v. Missouri State Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. HardeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- De Almada v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the WorldArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Barthel v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. BattySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.