Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1985No. Docket 71333PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Allstate Insurance Company appeals as of right from an order of summary judgment declaring Allstate solely liable for no-fault benefits payable to plaintiff. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This case arises out of an accident that occurred on the evening of February 12, 1982, when a snowmobile operated by Scott Thomas collided with a parked car. Plaintiff, John E. Schuster, who was then 16 years old, was a passenger on the snowmobile and was injured as a result of the collision. Operator Scott Thomas’s injuries resulted in his death.

The snowmobile was not covered by a policy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Underhill v. Safeco InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Royal Globe Insurance v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. SpaffordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Johnston v. Hartford InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Apperson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sentry Insurance Co. v. CastilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  2. Wills v. State Farm Ins. Cos.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Sentry Insurance Co. v. CastilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. Wills v. State Farm Ins. Cos.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API