Legal Opinion

People v. Finley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1994No. F019645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

— An amended information charged appellant Royce Randall Finley with one count of attempted indecent exposure in a public place, in violation of Penal Code 1 sections 664 and 314, subdivision 1, “a felony.” The information further alleged that appellant had several prior convictions for violations of section 314, subdivision 1, and that he had served prior prison terms therefor. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty. He subsequently admitted the prior convictions and prison terms.

The matter was tried before a jury, which found appellant guilty of attempted indecent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. Tung Thanh LeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. IbarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. BeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. (HC) Hubbard v. People of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. People v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API