Legal Opinion

People v. Mullins

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1992No. A051015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Blaine Corey Mullins appeals after the court convicted him of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) 1 and attempted kidnapping for the purpose of robbery (§§ 664, 209, subd. (b)). The court sentenced him to 10 years in state prison, to be served concurrently with a 57-year term imposed in a separate criminal action.

On appeal, he contends that his conviction of an attempt to violate section 209, subdivision (b) (kidnapping for purpose of robbery), was error because a completed kidnapping is a necessary element of that offense. We conclude that a defendant may be convicted of an attempt to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Andrisani v. HoodackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. (PS) Rogers v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. P. v. Hutt CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API