Legal Opinion

Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Richardson Realty, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The appeal from ruling of the court below in sustaining the demurrer requires an examination of the allegations of the complaint, together with the exhibits attached and connected therewith, in order to determine the sufficiency of the pleading to constitute a cause of action against the demurring defendant.

In the consideration of a demurrer it is the established rule that all the material facts alleged, aside from the deductions of the pleader, are deemed admitted, and that tbe pleading shall be liberally construed. Blackmore v. Winders, 144 N. C., 212; Ramsey v. Furniture Co., 209 N. C.,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Glenn v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bridges Ex Rel. City of Charlotte v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Fox v. Board of Commissioners of County of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Angell v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Hamilton v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Tobacco Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API