Legal Opinion

Tobacco Co. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

Is the statutory definition of “scrap or untied” tobacco so phrased that a tax based upon this definition would be unconstitutional? "We think not.

Plaintiff appellant attacks the statute as being discriminatory, not uniform, unreasonable, prohibitory, vague, and not a lawful delegation of the taxing power. All of these objections are aimed at an interpretation of the statutory definition which we do not think applicable, to wit, that the mere prohibition by warehouses of the sale of a designated type of tobacco by warehouses thereby renders the prohibited tobacco “scrap or untied” tobacco and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Glenn v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. . BrockwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . RazookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. American Equitable Assurance Co. of NY v. GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Nesbitt v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Leonard v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. DirecTV, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API