Legal Opinion

Mooers v. Hunter

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1934No. 1486—6208PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMEDLEY, Judge.

This case originated in county court, where defendant in error sued plaintiffs in error for $404.45 and recovered judgment for $220.40, which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 45 S.W.(2d) 387. Application for writ of error when first examined was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, but on motion for rehearing the writ was granted on account of an assignment of error complaining of a statement made by defendant in error in the presence of the jury to the effect that an absent witness, if completion of the trial were delayed until he could be present, would…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Garitty v. RaineyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Jones v. HickmanTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Brown v. ForeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Layton v. HightowerTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  5. National Compress Co. v. HamlinTexas Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dockum v. Mercury InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. West Disinfecting Co. v. Trustees of Crosby Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. City National Bank v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ziegelmeyer v. NealonTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Travelers Insurance v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API