Legal Opinion

Brown v. Fore

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1929No. 1114—5036PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvev, P. J.

The defendant in error, Mrs. Etta Fore, brought suit herein against Virgil Husbands in his individual capacity and against B. R. Brown, Emmett McFadden, and Virgil Husbands, as executors of the will of F. M. Fore, deceased. In her petition, she claims to be owner of certain vendor’s lien *116notes executed by Virgil Husbands and payable to E. M. Fore, and seeks to recover judgment against Husbands thereon, with foreclosure of the vendor’s lien. She further avers that said executors are asserting some sort of claim to said notes; and she seeks to have her claim thereto established as against them.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. TodTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Moore v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. White, Smith & Baldwin v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Lord v. New York Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. National Compress Co. v. HamlinTexas Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bishop v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Singer v. SingerTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Warren v. SchaweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. State Bank of Wheatland v. Bagley Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Aaron v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API