Legal Opinion

United States v. Martell (Two Cases

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 18, 1952No. 10739 and 10740PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for income tax evasion under Sections 145(b) and 3793(b) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code. 1

The defendant makes several points as a ground for reversal. The first is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction and that, therefore, a judgment of acquittal should be ordered. With this we do not agree. There was evidence upon which the prosecution was entitled to go to the jury upon both indictments. There was no error in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant nor in refusing to compel the prosecution to choose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hargrove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. United States v. John Paul MalinowskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Richard Mather BoardmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. Bernard Bloch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API