Legal Opinion

Bernard Bloch v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1955No. 14266PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, District Judge.

Appellant was charged in the District of Arizona in two counts with attempting to evade or defeat the payment of income taxes owing by him for the years 1947 and 1948, in violation of Section 145(b), Title 26, U.S.C.A. 1 After trial by a jury in the District Court, appellant was acquitted on Count one (1947 taxes) and convicted on Count two (1948 taxes). He appeals, assigning three specifications of error.

The first specification of error relied on is that the District Court erred in failing to give appellant’s requested Instruction No. 2. 2 There is no merit in this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Amos v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  3. Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Tomlinson v. LefkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API