Bank of Am., N.A. v. McFarland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Judge.
*15 Where, on a motion for summary judgment, the nonmovant fails to set forth specific facts rebutting the movant's showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact, a grant of summary judgment in favor of the movant is appropriate. Here, Plaintiff moved for summary *16 judgment and proved there was no genuine dispute as to any material fact. Defendant failed to set forth any specific facts rebutting Plaintiff's showing and therefore failed to meet his burden of production under Rule 56(e) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the trial court's grant of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Poor v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Piraino Bros. v. Atlantic Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- United States Steel Corp. v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aym Techs., LLC v. RodgersNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019
- Phillips Landing of Statesville, LP v. Keybank, National AssociationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- SCSI, LLC v. Kaco USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020