Legal Opinion

Dysart v. Colonial Fire Underwriters

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1927No. 20358. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This action comes here as a consolidation of eighteen actions at law brought by the plaintiff, based upon twenty-six policies of insurance issued by eighteen different insurance companies, to recover an aggregate of $72,500, claimed to be due for loss under the policies. The facts are long, very much involved, and, singularly, but little in dispute.. We shall give a general outline of what we consider the controlling facts necessary for an understanding of the case, and in doing so shall refer to the appellant Dysart as the plaintiff, the cross-appellant Maytown Mill Company as the mill…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Smith v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of VerbeekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. Meltzer v. Wendell-WestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Kindred v. BoalbeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. May v. RudellWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Behnke v. RadtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API