Legal Opinion

Smith v. National Bank of Commerce

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1927No. 20310. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellant sued to recover what he alleged to be preferential payments made by an insolvent corporation to the respondent. From a judgment on the merits dismissing his action, he has appealed.

The story may be well told by quoting the trial court’s finding's of fact, which are terse and to the- point.

‘ ‘ That, for several years previous to the time of the appointment of the said plaintiff as receiver for the said company, the said company had been borrowing moneys from the defendant bank, with which to carry on its business, and on January 9, 1924, the said company borrowed from the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Woods v. Metropolitan National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whiting v. RubinsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dysart v. Colonial Fire UnderwritersWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Brinker v. Peoples Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Goodin v. Palace Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API