Legal Opinion

Shields v. Garrison

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 12, 1998No. 22066-1-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bridgewater, A.C.J.

— Mehta Shields appeals the compensation awarded in her condemnation action for a way of private necessity, arguing that only nominal damages should have been awarded because the easement was over an existing roadway and there was no damage to the remaining property, and that attorney fees were not appropriate. We hold that a way of private necessity can be taken over an existing roadway, that the roadway is considered as an improvement, that the owner is entitled to an award that represents the fair market value of the easement, and that cost of the roadway is a legitimate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union v. Gateway Cafe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re City of MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beckman v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Kobza v. TrippCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. Heirs & Devisees of EasteyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND TRANSIT v. EasteyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Kenneth Hauge v. City Of Lacey And Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API