Legal Opinion

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND TRANSIT v. Eastey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 9, 2006No. 55908-7-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

144 P.3d 322 (2006)

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a regional Transit authority, dba Sound Transit, Respondent,

v.

The HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF Jack K. EASTEY, also appearing of record as John Kline Eastey, deceased; Jack's Auto Parts, Inc., a Washington corporation; Richard Franklin Eastey, Sr., as personal representative of the estate of John Kline Eastey, deceased; Frank Coluccio Construction Company, a Washington corporation; Donald J. O'Neill, as trustee for William C. O'Gorman, a single man; United States Department of Treasury; King County, a municipal corporation; City of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pande Cameron & Co. of Seattle, Inc. v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  2. Tapio Investment Co. I v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Kenneth Hauge v. City Of Lacey And Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. WVDOT, WVDOH and Thomas J. Smith v. Victor Morton EcholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API