Legal Opinion

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. Heirs & Devisees of Eastey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 7, 2006No. 55908-7-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 Sound Transit condemned a small strip of land to expand its right of way in front of Jack’s Auto Parts, Inc., a store owned by the heirs of Jack Eastey. The Eastey interests offered relevant evidence tending to prove it was the take, not loss of access to the right of way, that would force them to move customer parking and the entrance from the front of the store to the side. Because the trial court’s erroneous decision to exclude this evidence was prejudicial to the determination of just compensation, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

¶2 Sound Transit owns a right of way along…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pande Cameron & Co. of Seattle, Inc. v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  2. Tapio Investment Co. I v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. Heirs & Devisees of EasteyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Kenneth Hauge v. City Of Lacey And Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. WVDOT, WVDOH and Thomas J. Smith v. Victor Morton EcholsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API