State v. Tibbetts
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
This is an appeal by the defendant following a conviction for breaking, entering and larceny in the nighttime. 17 M.R.S.A. § 2103.
The appellant and one Patrick Eagan were separately indicted and, because the facts were identical, the two indictments were consolidated for trial. The propriety of this consolidation was originally challenged but that issue was not raised on appeal.
The appellant, in his statement of points on appeal, assigned eleven alleged errors. However, only six of these were urged as a basis for sustaining the appeal and we consider the others to have been…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. DoughtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. InmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- State v. FrankovigliaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- State v. GagnonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.