State v. Heald
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
The defendant was indicted, tried before a jury, and convicted of being an accessory before the fact to an armed robbery. He had likewise been indicted as an accessory after the fact to the same robbery and the issue arising from the treatment given this charge will be dealt with under Point II, infra. His timely appeal is premised on five points, none of which is meritorious, but which requires individual discussion.
I
Motion to Dismiss the Indictment
This motion was premised on the assumption that the grand jury found a “True Bill,” (quoting from defendant’s brief) “based…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WallaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- State v. GoyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Augustus F. Heald v. Garrell S. Mullaney, Warden, Maine State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.