Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 1984No. C2-83-1200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant Robert Armstrong was convicted by a jury of simple robbery in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.24 (1982). On appeal, he contends the evidence was legally insufficient to justify his conviction, that at the very least his conviction should be reduced to attempted simple robbery, and that the sentence should be reduced from 46 to 23 months. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

In the late evening of February 23, 1983, Sergeant David Niebur of the Minneapolis Police Department operated as a decoy in an effort to reduce the number of street robberies in downtown…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. State v. HeinzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In Re the Welfare of R.L.N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API