Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 8, 2018No. 1:17–cv–01213–LJO–SKOPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence J. O'Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
*900I. INTRODUCTION
In September 2017, Plaintiffs filed a putative class action complaint against Electrolux Home Products, Inc. ("Electrolux") alleging defects in a self-cleaning oven Electrolux manufactures. (Doc. 1.) Electrolux filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) asserting many of Plaintiffs' claims are insufficiently pled. Plaintiffs filed a brief in opposition, Electrolux filed a reply brief, and the matter was taken under submission. For the reasons set forth below, Electrolux's motion to dismiss is…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- In re Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- BUTERA v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Castillo v. Prime Hydration LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Cullis v. Tesla, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.