Legal Opinion
Atwood v. Sipple
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 22, 1987No. 73736PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Plaintiffs Sipple and Gibson sued Atwood and others for breach of contract, fraud, and conversion arising out of a joint venture agreement which basically provided that 119 saltwater damaged British Leyland automobiles were to be purchased from British Leyland and then shipped to Guatemala for sale. Because of the damage, the cars could not be sold in the United States. Atwood, a retired Army officer, was at that time living in Guatemala and claimed to be involved in the import/export business there. Although a substantial shipment was sent to Guatemala, for a myriad of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gearhart v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Wise, Simpson, Aiken & Associates, Inc. v. Rosser White Hobbs Davidson McClellan Kelly, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Beck v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Collins v. Lyon, Lyon & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Walker v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- In Re Mirant Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- Peterson v. BaumwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Sipple v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Carragher v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.