Legal Opinion
Sipple v. Atwood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 25, 1996No. A96A1198PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
Sipple and Gibson, plaintiffs below, appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel responses to post-judgment discovery requests. The motion was denied based on Atwood’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
This case previously appeared hére and the facts of the underlying dispute are set out in Atwood v. Sipple, 182 Ga. App. 831 (357 SE2d 273) (1987). After entry of judgment in their favor, plaintiffs filed 29 interrogatories and a request for production of documents containing 11 categories of documents to be produced. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cornelius v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Atwood v. SippleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Dial v. Bent Tree National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Wieland v. WielandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Heritage Insurance Co. of America v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- HICKEY Et Al. v. RREF BB SBL ACQUISITIONS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- In Re Estate of SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Major Fortson v. Render C. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Major Fortson v. Render C. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- PRESTON ELLIOTT D/B/A THE ELLIOTT GROUP v. FLORENCE SMITHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016