Legal Opinion
In re J.F.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2017No. NOS. C–160719; C–160720; C–160721; C–160722; C–160723PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Myers, Judge.
{¶ 1} The state of Ohio has appealed from the trial court's adoption of the magistrate's decisions that dismissed charges against appellee J.F. based upon the following determinations: that J.F. had not been restored to competency; that J.F. likely could not be restored to competency within a reasonable time; and that the time allowed by statute for the attainment of competency could not be tolled once the competency-restoration process had begun.
Facts and Procedure
{¶ 2} The state filed complaints alleging that J.F. was a delinquent child for committing acts that, if committed by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Jacobson v. Kaforey (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Hulsmeyer v. Hospice of Southwest Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re Eddie O.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ewing v. UC HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re D.J.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re C.B.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019