Legal Opinion

People v. Turaine

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1991PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

On the day of defendant’s jury trial one of the witnesses against him, who was being held on other charges, was mistakenly placed in the holding pen in the courthouse with defendant. During the trial, the prosecutor attempted to have the witness testify that while in the holding pen, defendant threatened or intimidated him to prevent him from testifying. Before receiving the evidence, the trial court conducted a hearing in the absence of the jury. Over objection, the court excluded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. People Ex Rel. Lupo v. FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. People ex rel. Lupo v. FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Darius Morgan v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API