Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1965PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

On these appeals brought by permission, defendants Anderson and Thompson seek to reverse their convictions of robbery, first degree. While the defendant Anderson was in custody awaiting trial, a hearing was held on a motion to suppress certain evidence and the District Attorney presented the testimony of a witness relative to the legality of the search. Because of his unexplained absence from the courtroom during this hearing, Anderson asserts that there was a denial of due process and a violation of section 356 of the Code of Criminal *286Procedure. The motion to suppress was denied and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Maurer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. EppsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Paul Clark v. James Stinson, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API