Legal Opinion
Haughton v. International Woodworkers of America
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 12, 1958No. Civ. No. 9854PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs (Elk Creek) in this cause have instituted this action under Sec. 303(b) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, as amended, hereafter called the “Act,” 29 U.S.C.A. 187(b) 1 alleging that the Defendants are engaged in a strike forbidden by Sec. 303(a) (1) of the Act, which provides in part:
“(a) It shall be unlawful * * in an industry or activity affecting commerce, for any labor organization to engage in, or to induce or encourage the employees of any employer to engage in, a strike * *, where an object thereof is—
“(1) forcing or requiring any employer * *…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Juneau Spruce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Engineers, Chemists & Technicians, Local 231District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riverside Coal Company, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Hyatt Chalet Motels, Inc. v. Salem Building & Construction Trades CouncilDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968
- Bechtel Corp. v. Local 215, Laborers' International UnionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- McLeod v. Bakery, Pastry & Frozen Baked Products Drivers & HelpersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
- Riverside Coal Company, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969