Legal Opinion

Hall v. Nunn Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1916No. 958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Hale County; R. C. Joiner, Judge. Garnishment proceedings by the Nunn Electric Company against L. C. Wayland, in which Ira W. Hall intervened. To review a judgment for the garnishee, the intervener brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

On September 20, 1913, L. C. Wayland and wife entered into a contract in writing with Whyman Bros., a copartnership, by the terms of which they were to dig, and equip with machinery, an irrigating well upon Wayland's property, that would flow at least 1,100 gallons of water per minute, in consideration of which Wayland was to pay the sum of $3,400, and by the terms of the contract a lien was created on 160 acres of land (upon which the well was to be dug) to secure said sum of money.

On January 16, 1913, Whyman Bros. transferred their right and interest in said contract to W. I. Busby, as well…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Capes v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gause v. ConeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Holmes v. Pope & FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Medley v. American Radiator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Water Co. v. BungeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Hubbell, Slack & Co. v. Farmers' Union Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Blanks v. RadfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Blanks v. RadfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API