Legal Opinion
United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 15, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-68; Court 09-00041PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff United States Customs and Border Protection 1 (“the Government” or “CBP”) commenced this action against Trek Leather, Inc. (“Trek”), and Harish Shadadpuri (“Mr. Shadadpuri”) for unpaid customs duties and civil penalties for violating section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (2003). 2 Currently before the Court are the Government’s motion for summary judgment and the defendants’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the United States Court of International Trade. In accordance with the decision…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen Organ Company, Cross-Appellee v. Kimball International, Inc., MacMillan Inc., and Conn Keyboards, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Complex MacHine Works Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1999
- United States v. Thorson Chemical Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Adaptive Microsystems, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- United States v. Nitek Elecs., Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2012
- United States v. Trek Leather, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013