United States v. Complex MacHine Works Co.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WALLACH, Judge.
This matter having come on for trial in New York,- New York, on April 5,1999, the parties having submitted it for decision and judgment after completion of the trial on April 5, 1999, the Court having considered the Defendants’ Post-Trial Brief On Penalty Assessment (“Defendant’s Brief’) submitted on May 3, 1999, Plaintiffs Post-Trial Brief (“Plaintiffs Response”) submitted on May 17, 1999 and the Joint Stipulations dated April 5, 1999, and having given due consideration to the testimony of all witnesses, together with due consideration of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Hitachi America, Ltd., Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Hitachi, Ltd., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. National Semiconductor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- United States v. MatthewsUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.