Legal Opinion
United States v. Adaptive Microsystems, LLC
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 10, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-50; Court 12-00122PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
Defendant Adaptive Microsystems, LLC (“New AMS”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56 on plaintiff United States Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) claim for unpaid import duties and penalties under sections 592(c) and (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1592(c), (d) (2006). New AMS’s Mem. Supp. Mot. Summ. J. 2 (“New AMS’s Mem.”). New AMS also moves to impose sanctions under USCIT Rule 11, alleging Customs acted unreasonably in filing and continuing to pursue this action. New…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Larry Whitford v. Captain BoglinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- G.G. Marck & Assocs., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- United States v. CTS Holding, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- United States v. Sterling Footwear, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2017