Legal Opinion
Amresco New England II, L.P. v. Colossale
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 24, 2001No. AC 20259PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The principal issue in this mortgage foreclosure action is whether a mortgagee can require a trial court to order a strict foreclosure on all the separate parcels covered by a blanket mortgage if a foreclosure limited to fewer than all parcels will satisfy the mortgage debt. Exercising its equitable discretion, the court ordered a limited strict foreclosure. The mortgagee challenges the validity of this order. The validity *51of the court’s order raises a question of first impression for this court. We affirm the judgment.
The plaintiff, Amresco New England II, L.P. (Amr-esco),1…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Connecticut National Bank v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Thompson v. OrcuttConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- City of New Haven v. God's Corner Church, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Toro Credit Co. v. ZeytoonjianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- 2 Fraser Place Condominium Assn., Inc. v. MathisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.