Legal Opinion

3m Nat. Advertising Co. v. City of Tampa Code Enf. Bd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1991No. 91-01401PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

587 So.2d 640 (1991)

3M NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, Petitioner,

v.

CITY OF TAMPA CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, Respondent.

No. 91-01401.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 16, 1991.

Theodore C. Taub and Scott I. Steady of Taub & Williams, P.A., Tampa, for petitioner.

Jeffrey T. Shear and Robert M. Larrinaga, Assistant City Attorneys, Tampa, for respondent.

2Per curiam

3M National Advertising Company (hereafter "3M") seeks certiorari review of an appellate decision of the circuit court. We find that the circuit court, in affirming a final order of the City of Tampa Code Enforcement Board…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hulshof v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Nash Miami Motors v. BandelSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Sarasota County v. BOW POINT ON GULF CONDO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. State, Department of Transportation v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Total Outdoor Corp. v. City of Seattle Department of Planning & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API