Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided September 25, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Richard H. Roth Lighthouse Point City Attorney 1500 East Atlantic Boulevard Pompano Beach, Florida 33060-6749

Dear Mr. Roth:

You ask the following question:

Does the removal of a portion of a nonconforming use of land by the county to install water lines constitute attrition, abandonment, or an act of God so as to prohibit the reinstallation of the nonconforming use?

In sum:

The removal of a portion of a nonconforming use of land by the county to install water lines does not constitute attrition, abandonment, or an act of God so as to prohibit the reinstallation of the nonconforming use.

Accordi…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. State, Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Fortunato v. City of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. Lewis v. City of Atlantic BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. 3m Nat. Advertising Co. v. City of Tampa Code Enf. Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. Parkway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API