Legal Opinion

Nash Miami Motors v. Bandel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 18, 1950PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 So.2d 701 (1950)

NASH MIAMI MOTORS, Inc., et al.

v.

BANDEL et al.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

July 18, 1950.

Rehearing Denied September 11, 1950.

Daniel L. Ginsberg, Miami, for petitioner.

Mallory H. Horton and George S. Okell, Miami, for respondents.

HOBSON, Justice.

This is the third time the instant suit has been brought here on petition for certiorari. In its first appearance, (160 Fla. 925, 37 So.2d 366), Nash Miami Motors, Inc. represented that it was the owner of four certain automobiles which had been placed, without transfer of titles, on the used car lot of A.A. Auto…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nash Miami Motors, Inc. v. BandelSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  2. Wells v. EvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1973 Rolls RoyceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Enfinger v. Order of United Commercial TravelersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce, V.I.N. SRH-16266 Ex Rel. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Hettinger v. KleinmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. 3m Nat. Advertising Co. v. City of Tampa Code Enf. Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API