Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Drucker & Falk

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1983No. 8210SC992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

A landlord is under a duty to its tenant to inspect and repair the common areas of the premises. W. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts § 63 (4th ed. 1971). A tenant is normally seen as an invitee and the liability of a landlord for physical harm to its tenant depends on if it knows of the danger. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 344 (1965), especially comment f:

f. Duty to police premises. [The possessor of land] is ordinarily under no duty to exercise any care until he knows or has reason to know that the acts of the third person are occurring, or are about to occur. ...…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Watts v. Pama Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Urbano v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. TharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Cassell v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Heng Or v. EdwardsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Faucette v. 6303 Carmel Road, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Connelly Ex Rel. McBride v. Family Inns of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API