Legal Opinion

Adams v. Tamaqua Underwear Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1932No. Appeal 294PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The plaintiff filed a bill in equity alleging inter alia that the defendants were trespassing on her property in the erection of a building, praying that they be restrained from further entering; and that the damages already caused be ascertained and compensated.

The parties to the action are the owners of two contiguous town lots, situate in the Borough of Tamaqua. The title to both came from a common source. Anna E. Helwig was the former owner, and in her last will and testament, devised lot No. 8 to her son, George Christian Berner, and lot No. 7 to Anna S. Snyder,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reiter v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Miles v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Brown v. M'KinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  4. Hutchison v. Little Four Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Reiter v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Plauchak v. BolingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Lyons v. ANDREWSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Zeglin v. GahagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Plott v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Schlagel v. LombardiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API