Brown v. M'Kinney
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
ERROR to the common pleas of Dauphin county. This was an action of ejectment by Horatio Brown and James Pople against Henry M’Kinney and others for the one fortieth part of an acre of land being part of a lot in the town of Harrisburg.' The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Huston J.
The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs below, and brought this ejectment as is stated in the writ for the fortieth part of an acre more or less being part of lot No. 295 in Harrisburg bounded &c., &c. The plaintiffs deduced title to lot No. 2S5. On the west it was bounded by lot No. 294. On this lot and on the side next to 295 stood a house built more than thirty years ago.— There was no objection to the plaintiff beginning at this house and measuring his distance along the street. The front of each lot on the street was fifty-two feet six…
2Cited by14 opinions
- City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Dimura v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Burns v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Miles v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Zeglin v. GahagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.