Zeglin v. Gahagen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
In this appeal involving a boundary dispute, the question presented is whether privity of estate between succeeding landowners is required to support tacking periods of ownership to form the requisite twenty-one-year period under acquiescence theory.
Appellants, Frank and Tammy Zeglin, and Appellees, Sean and Kimberlee Gahagen, own adjoining properties in Windber, Paint Township, Somerset County. The Zeglins purchased in 1977 from Cora Murphy, who, together with her late husband, had owned the property since 1937. The Gahagens bought from Margaret Swincinski in 1989, who…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Inn Le'Daerda, Inc. v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- Dimura v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moore v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Long Run Timber Co., Ltd. P'ship v. Dep't of Conservation & Natural Res.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Viall, W. v. Garvin, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Bartkowski, T. v. Ramondo, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Bruzgulis, S. v. Landowners WildlifeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.