Legal Opinion

Plott v. Cole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1988No. 29PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County dismissing plaintiffs action in ejectment and declaring defendant the owner of property in dispute. We reverse.

This boundary dispute arises out of the following facts. Theo Plott owned half of a double frame house in Dauphin County. She had lived in the western side of the house, 157 Ann Street, for fifty-six years before her death, which occurred during the pendency of this appeal. Following Theo Plotfs death, her daughter, administratrix of her estate, was substituted as appellant in this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Niles v. Fall Creek Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Dimura v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Vlachos v. WitherowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Reiter v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Wittig v. CarlacciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Plauchak v. BolingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Zeglin v. GahagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Schimp v. AllamanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API