Legal Opinion
Singh v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 22, 2003No. 02-71360; Agency No. A73-428-573PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Amarjeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review for an abuse of discretion, Shaar v. INS, 141 F.3d 953, 955 (9th Cir.1998), and deny the petition.
Singh’s motion to reopen alleged that he never received the BIA’s prior order dismissing his appeal and was therefore precluded from filing a timely appeal. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8943, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,491 Veronico Blas Almario Kalaw Eleanor Lu Dalisay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Florencia Garcia Revilla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Anastacia Miranda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- J. Sacramento Garcia Maria L. Gomez Gamino Noel C. Garciagomez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Arie SHAAR; Helina Shaar; Shay Moshe Shaar, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hector Cortez-Acosta v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Javier SEQUEIRA-SOLANO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Singh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Singh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007