Arie SHAAR; Helina Shaar; Shay Moshe Shaar, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge Fernandez; Dissent by Judge Browning.
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
After deportation proceedings against them had become final and they had been given the privilege of voluntary departure, Arie Shaar, his wife Helina Shaar, and their adult son Shay Shaar petitioned for reopen*955ing of their case so that they could apply for suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(1). The Immigration Judge denied reopening because the Shaars had not departed during the allotted voluntary departure time, and the Board of Immigration Appeals upheld that decision, even though the Shaars…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Nicolas Rodriguez-Lariz Maria De Jesus Guevara-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Carlos Humberto Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Maria Isabel Gonzalez De Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Pedro Vilarde Reyes v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.