Legal Opinion
Hector Cortez-Acosta v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 8, 2000No. 97-71033PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Per curiam
I. FACTS
Mr. Cortez-Acosta, a resident alien, was ordered in December 1994 to show cause why he should not be deported. The reason stated in English and Spanish on his notice was that he was “an alien who ... knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law.” This all grew out of an incident at the Tecate border station. Though the facts are not established by evidence in the record, it appears to be undisputed that Mr. Cortez-Acosta was a passenger in the first of two cars owned by the driver that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Juan Cesar Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Khosrow Gharib Rashtabadi v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Zhen Tau Liu v. Philip L. Waters, Acting District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Ramon Trias--Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Emmanuel Senyo Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Erlinda Gerardo Zara v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Maria G. Ramos Jessica Ramos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cruz-Garza v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.